How have courts considered concurrent sentencing in sentencing cases?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Tyler, E071094 (Cal. App. 2019):

However, "in light of the presumption on a silent record that the trial court is aware of the applicable law, including statutory discretion at sentencing, we cannot presume error where the record does not establish on its face that the trial court misunderstood the scope of that discretion. [Citations.]" (People v. Gutierrez (2009) 174 Cal.App.4th 515, 527.)

C. The Possibility of Concurrent Sentencing.

Other Questions


Is there any case law in which a sentencing court considered improper reasons for selecting the upper term for the enhancement in a sentence for a motor vehicle accident? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court of Appeal have to remand the case for sentencing if the trial court errs in imposing a sentence? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant entitled to a reduced sentence from a sentencing court where the sentencing court was unaware of the scope of its discretionary powers? (California, United States of America)
In a capital crime case, how has the Court considered the sentencing of an accomplice as a factor in determining the upper term sentence? (California, United States of America)
When a judge's original sentencing has been struck down by the Court of Appeal, does the sentencing court have the power to impose any sentence permitted under the applicable statutes and rules on remand? (California, United States of America)
Does section 654 of the Criminal Code require the concurrent imposition of concurrent sentences of two separate sentences? (California, United States of America)
If a defendant has multiple convictions in the same proceeding, can the sentencing court order that any determinate sentence be served concurrently or consecutively? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for reducing a sentence when the court was unaware at the time of sentencing that the sentence was too lenient? (California, United States of America)
Does the court erred in imposing a life sentence with a determinate sentence for each serious felony conviction found to be true in this case? (California, United States of America)
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.