How have appellate opinions been interpreted in the context of sexual assault cases?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Garfel, 2d Crim. No. B292079 (Cal. App. 2019):
including . . . the appellate opinion affirming the judgment of conviction. [Citations.]" (People v. Cruz (2017) 15 Cal.App.5th 1105, 1109-1110 (Cruz).)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the relevant case law regarding allegations of sexual assault made against appellant in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the statutory language of the Sexual Offences Prevention Act (SVPA) in the context of sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
When a photograph of a defendant in a sexual assault case was found to have been taken in the context of an alleged sexual assault, is there any connection to the subsequent verdict of attempted sodomy? (California, United States of America)
How has the probation report been interpreted in the context of sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
How has section 654 of the California Code of Criminal Procedure been interpreted in the context of sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admitting prior sexual assault evidence in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
In a sexual assault case, is it possible for a defendant to sexually assault two women by touching their genitals? (California, United States of America)
How has section 654 of the California Criminal Code been interpreted in the context of a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
What is the relevant case law in the context of sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
For the purposes of section 1108.2(1) of the California Criminal Code, is there any constitutional error in a trial court's decision to instruct the jury in a sexual assault case to consider the use of sexual assault evidence admitted under Section 1108? (California, United States of America)
