How has the term "convicted" been interpreted in the context of section 1170.95 of the California Criminal Code?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Lopez, H047254 (Cal. App. 2020):

We begin by interpreting the term "convicted" as it is used in the third condition. A person stands " 'convicted' " upon the return of a guilty verdict after trial or the entry of a plea admitting guilt. (People v. Davis (2010) 185 Cal.App.4th 998, 1001.) In the context of section 1170.95, the petitioner contests his or her guilt of murder under the current law, so "convicted" does not refer to admission of guilt by plea. Instead, "convicted" can be construed as "found guilty if he or she were now tried." Using that interpretation of "convicted," the third condition can be construed as "petitioner could not be found guilty of first or second degree murder under the current law if he or she were now tried."5

Other Questions


How have sections 424, subdivision 1 and 425 of the California Criminal Code been interpreted in the context of Section 424(1) of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Does section 667 of the California Criminal Code prohibit the District Attorney from invoking section 654 of the Criminal Code to strike a prior conviction enhancement under Section 667? (California, United States of America)
For the purposes of section 1202.4, subdivision (f) of the California Criminal Code, how have courts interpreted the meaning of the term "criminal conduct" in the context of a criminal conviction? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 654 of the California Criminal Code when a defendant is convicted of a sex offence under both sections of the S. 654(1) and (2) of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
For the purposes of section 1202.4, subdivision (f) of the California Criminal Code, how have courts interpreted the meaning of the term "criminal conduct" in the context of a criminal conviction? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be found to have committed a single physical act for purposes of section 654 of the California Criminal Code, Section 215 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 422 of the Criminal Code for carjacking? (California, United States of America)
How has section 654 of the California Criminal Code been interpreted in the context of Section 654(1) of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Does section 27 of the California Criminal Code, section 778a, subdivision (a)(1) of the Criminal Code of California apply to a defendant who is charged with a charge of conspiracy to commit a crime committed outside of the state? (California, United States of America)
When a convicted criminal has completed his sentence for a conviction for a crime committed under section 1170.18, subdivision (f) of the California Criminal Code, can the conviction be reduced to a misdemeanor? (California, United States of America)
Does section 667.6 of the California Criminal Code (c) of Section 654 of the Criminal Code apply to a burglary conviction? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.