How has the federal court interpreted a motion to dismiss?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Dahms, 938 F.2d 131 (9th Cir. 1991):
The district court's decision to deny the motion to dismiss was grounded on its interpretation of the federal statute. We review this interpretation de novo. See United States v. Gomez, 911 F.2d 219 (9th Cir.1990).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for a motion to compel the Court to dismiss a motion alleging that a judge has improperly interpreted the interpretation of a statutory interpretation of an administrative determination? ("New York", United States of America)
Does a state court have the authority to interpret the findings of a federal court when determining whether a federal judge has found that a state judge has jurisdiction to interpret a federal finding? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does the Court-ordered dismissal of a motion for contempt of court apply to appeal against the motion to dismiss the motion? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a motion to dismiss a preliminary injunction has been granted by the Court of Appeal, when the motion is also dismissed by the District Court on the basis of a failure to exhaust tribal remedies, does the motion merge into the final judgment? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for a federal district court to determine whether a state court or federal court has jurisdiction to rule on a federal Railroad Commission case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the scope of the federal government's appeal against the federal district court's decision not to grant a motion to dismiss the motion? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a federal court dismisses an action with prejudice, does the dismissal of the action by the federal district court result in a separate contract dispute arising from the settlement agreement? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a federal district court's interpretation of a federal statute a de novo review of the interpretation of the federal statute? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a federal district court's interpretation of a federal statute a de novo review of the interpretation of the federal statute? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
If a motion is brought before the Superior Court of Justice in the absence of a motion before the Court of Appeal, and the motion has been adjourned for a second time, is there an instance where this court should take jurisdiction? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
