How has the federal court considered prejudicial potential of evidence in a balancing analysis under Rule 403?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Harper, 09-2558-cr (2nd Cir. 2011):
The district court considered the prejudicial potential of this evidence in its balancing analysis under Federal Rule of Evidence 403. There is no basis to conclude that the court's determination under Rule 403 was irrational or arbitrary. See United States v. Bicaksiz, 194 F.3d 390, 396 (2d Cir. 1999).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for a federal district court to determine whether a state court or federal court has jurisdiction to rule on a federal Railroad Commission case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In a federal habeas review of a claim of insufficiency of evidence in a criminal case, what are the requirements for the federal court to consider all evidence? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for abuse of discretion in a federal district court's balancing under Federal Rule of Evidence 403? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a state court rejects some claims but does not expressly address a federal claim, must the federal court presume that the federal claim was adjudicated on the merits? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a state court have the authority to interpret the findings of a federal court when determining whether a federal judge has found that a state judge has jurisdiction to interpret a federal finding? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a state court rejects some claims but does not expressly address a federal claim, can the federal court presume that the federal claim was adjudicated on the merits? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does Section 5G1.3 of the Federal Guidelines for Federal Sentences apply to a defendant who is convicted of a federal charge of possession of a firearm by a federal court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How has the court treated the argument that the court improperly attributed more weight to circumstantial evidence than to direct evidence? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a federal district court's interpretation of a federal statute a de novo review of the interpretation of the federal statute? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is there any case law in which the federal courts have been ordered to consider the competence of the state courts? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
