How has the de minimis rule been applied in statutory contexts?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Troester v. Starbucks Corp., 235 Cal.Rptr.3d 820, 421 P.3d 1114, 5 Cal.5th 829 (Cal. 2018):

The de minimis rule, as a background principle, has been invoked in a variety of statutory contexts, and courts have decided such cases by examining whether application of the rule would be consistent with the statutory purpose. (See Goehring v. Chapman University (2004) 121 Cal.App.4th 353, 384, 17 Cal.Rptr.3d 39 ["Substantial compliance with a statute 'will suffice if the purpose of the statute is satisfied ... but substantial

[5 Cal.5th 844]

Other Questions


When interpreting statutory language, does the language "in context of the statutory framework as a whole" apply? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted statutory language in the context of the statutory framework? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted statutory language in the context of statutory interpretation? (California, United States of America)
Does the statutory presumption of negligence apply to a professional negligence case outside the context of medical malpractice? (California, United States of America)
Does section 473(b) of the California Statutory Code of Civil Procedure apply to "value" in the context of forgery? (California, United States of America)
Does counsel who fail to respond when given the chance to respond to arguments in an adversarial context deprive the trial court of the opportunity to consider their arguments in a similar context? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with a plaintiff's claim that the death verdict was based on a series of statutory, constitutional and statutory violations? (California, United States of America)
Does the de minimis rule apply to employee compensation cases specifically using the Lindow factors? (California, United States of America)
How has the mootness rule been applied in the context of race motivation cases? (California, United States of America)
Does section 11580.2(c)(3) of the California Insurance Code apply in the underinsured context? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.