How has the Court treated the appellant in the context of his application for leave of counsel?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Hernandez, B253166 (Cal. App. 2015):
21. In light of our Discussion, we reject any claims in this case that appellant's constitutional rights were violated, he was denied effective assistance of counsel by any failures of his trial counsel to pose appropriate objections as to any issues (see People v. Slaughter (2002) 27 Cal.4th 1187, 1219), or cumulative prejudicial error occurred.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, does the appellate court have power to substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
How have we treated the appellant in the context of his application for leave of absence? (California, United States of America)
Can an appellant argue that the lower court erred and leave it to the appellate court? (California, United States of America)
What is the state of the law in relation to the conduct of appellant's counsel in the context of his application for leave of execution? (California, United States of America)
Does section 7895 of the California Family Code require an appellate court to appoint counsel for a parent unable to afford counsel for their child who is a dependent child of the juvenile court? (California, United States of America)
Can a court's frustration and irritation at counsel's repeated efforts to violate evidentiary rules be viewed as "friction between court and counsel"? (California, United States of America)
How has the court disposed of a motion alleging that the trial court failed to conduct an inquiry into the grounds for appellant's dissatisfaction with appointed counsel? (California, United States of America)
Does counsel who fail to respond when given the chance to respond to arguments in an adversarial context deprive the trial court of the opportunity to consider their arguments in a similar context? (California, United States of America)
