California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Cent. Cal. Med. Imaging Inc. v. Fresno Imaging Ctr., F064746 (Cal. App. 2013):
In summary, the trial court resolved the disputed factual issues regarding the alleged conflict of interest by drawing reasonable inferences from the evidence. We have no power to draw different inferences. Plaintiffs' declarations provide substantial evidence to support the trial court's implied finding that Paganetti did not wrongfully acquire an unfair advantage that undermines the integrity of the judicial process. (Responsible Citizens v. Superior Court (1993) 16 Cal.App.4th 1717, 1725.) The trial court did not abuse its discretion when it denied the motion to disqualify counsel for plaintiffs.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.