California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Executive Life Ins. Co., In re, 32 Cal.App.4th 344, 38 Cal.Rptr.2d 453 (Cal. App. 1995):
We accepted jurisdiction in the writ proceeding because of a showing made by appellants, then acting as petitioners, that there was such a need for quick disposition of the questions raised in the petition that the remedy of an appeal disposing of the issues was inadequate. We decided the questions as to which we issued our alternative writ and nothing more. Indeed we lacked the power to extend the scope of our decision because to have gone beyond the dimensions of the alternative writ would have denied notice and opportunity to be heard to the respondents. (See Kowis v. Howard (1992) 3 Cal.4th 888, 894-895, 12 Cal.Rptr.2d 728, 838 P.2d 250.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.