How has the court determined that appellant intentionally engaged in a fraudulent credit card scheme?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Stein, 500 F.2d 678 (9th Cir. 1974):
The evidence reflects that appellant supplied false information to obtain the credit cards, and through their use he later incurred the large sum of obligations which went unpaid. The jury could and did conclude that appellant intentionally engaged in this scheme to defraud. See United States v. Larsen, supra.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does a federal court have jurisdiction to determine whether a state court's determination was incorrect? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a party’s intention is a determining factor in determining whether there is a contract for services? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
If a court finds that a sanction imposed by a district court was an abuse of power, does the court have any authority to determine whether the sanction was abused or abused? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What factors are considered in determining whether to refer a fraudulent conveyance action to the bankruptcy court rather than the district court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for a federal district court to determine whether a state court or federal court has jurisdiction to rule on a federal Railroad Commission case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does the fact that appellant pleaded guilty to a charge of sexual assault in the Superior Court of Justice at the Court of Appeal preclude the appellant from seeking federal relief? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the standard of "substantive reasonableness" used by the Court of Appeal to determine whether a factor relied on by the sentencing court was unreasonable? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a motion to hear a claim by the appellant against the appellant has been successful? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What are the objective factors used by the Court to determine whether a corporation has an intention to profit? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What are the implications of the Court of Appeal's decision in a contempt case against appellant in which appellant was denied a retained attorney? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
