How has the court dealt with a motion for a new trial in an appeal from an amended judgment?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Kelly v. Sparkling Water Co., 334 P.2d 210 (Cal. App. 1959):
City of Long Beach v. Wright, 134 Cal.App. 366, 25 P.2d 541, was an appeal from an amended judgment. One judge presided at the trial; another was designated to hear the motion for a new trial. The judge who ruled on the motion for a new trial increased the amounts awarded to condemnees. The court held (134 Cal.App. at page 370, 25 P.2d at page 542):
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have the courts dealt with a motion of appeal against a judgment that found that defendant failed to provide a supplemental brief to the Court on appeal? (California, United States of America)
What is the impact of a motion to amend a motion in the Superior Court of Appeal against a motion by a defendant who alleges that the motion was improperly adjourned? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of an amended judgment in the Superior Court of Appeal against a defendant who has appealed against the amended judgment? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with a motion of appeal against a judgment that found that a defendant has failed to file a supplemental brief to the Court on appeal? (California, United States of America)
How has the Court of Appeal dealt with a motion to reverse a judgment in the Superior Court of Justice? (California, United States of America)
Does a trial court's decision to deny leave to amend for an abuse of discretion in a motion to amend a motion? (California, United States of America)
Can a motion to appeal a postconviction finding that the trial court lacks jurisdiction to hear the motion be appealed? (California, United States of America)
Does a motion for a new trial need to be denied because the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for new trial? (California, United States of America)
Does a denial of a motion for reconsideration by the appellate court of the Superior Court of Appeal affect the appealability of the denial of the motion to reconsideration? (California, United States of America)
In a motion for a new trial, is the trial court bound by the same principles as the court of appeal? (California, United States of America)
