How has the court applied the statutory presumption in determining whether there was actual knowledge or not?

The trial court both found actual knowledge and applied the statutory presumption. After having completed in its opinion its treatment of the statutory presumption it detailed the testimony of the booksellers in which they admitted personally [32 N.Y.2d 21] selling many copies of the magazine. It also noted that each defendant had ordered and reordered the magazine when a new issue came out or on exhaustion of the current supply. It wrote: 'Such facts are similar to those presented in People v. Weingarten, 50 Misc.2d 635, 640, 271 N.Y.S.2d 158, 164; aff'd, 55 Misc.2d 681, 286 N.Y.S.2d 429, reversed on other

Page 73