How has the construction of a general term or category in a criminal statute been interpreted?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Taggart, 242 Cal.Rptr.3d 734, 31 Cal.App.5th 607 (Cal. App. 2019):

construction, which in the law is known as ejusdem generis , "applies whether the specific words follow general words in a statute or vice versa. In either event, the general term or category is restricted to those things that are similar to those which are enumerated specifically. " " ( People v. Arias (2008) 45 Cal.4th 169, 180, 85 Cal.Rptr.3d 1, 195 P.3d 103.) In construing criminal statutes, this rule is stringently applied. ( Id. at p. 181, 85 Cal.Rptr.3d 1, 195 P.3d 103.)

Other Questions


When a section of the California Civil Code provides for construction of a statute, how do courts interpret the construction of the statute? (California, United States of America)
Does the ex post facto clause in the California Criminal Code apply to a judicial construction of a criminal statute that is unexpected and indefensible? (California, United States of America)
Does section 125.3 of the California Code of Civil Procedure apply to the construction of the statute, and if so, does the court have jurisdiction to interpret the interpretation of the law? (California, United States of America)
When harmonizing two statutes relating to the same subject, can a particular or specific statute take precedence over a conflicting general statute? (California, United States of America)
Is there any instructional error in general criminal intent instruction used by the trial court to include counts 4 and 7 in the General Criminal intent instruction? (California, United States of America)
For the purposes of section 1202.4, subdivision (f) of the California Criminal Code, how have courts interpreted the meaning of the term "criminal conduct" in the context of a criminal conviction? (California, United States of America)
For the purposes of section 1202.4, subdivision (f) of the California Criminal Code, how have courts interpreted the meaning of the term "criminal conduct" in the context of a criminal conviction? (California, United States of America)
When an agency adopts a new interpretation of a statute and rejects an old interpretation of the statute? (California, United States of America)
Is section 1001.36 of the California Criminal Code a "stressed interpretation" of the law and, if so, would it be impertinent for the court to place a strained interpretation upon the statute? (California, United States of America)
Is a criminal offence punishable by section 654 of the California Criminal Code when it violates more than one criminal statute? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.