How has the California Supreme Court interpreted the hearsay rule in social studies?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Malinda S., In re, 272 Cal.Rptr. 787, 51 Cal.3d 368, 795 P.2d 1244 (Cal. 1990):

The difficulty in interpreting the foregoing provisions is that neither explicitly creates an exception to the hearsay rule. Accordingly, we must construe those provisions to determine whether they implicitly create hearsay[51 Cal.3d 377] exceptions for social studies. (See Lungren v. Deukmejian (1988) 45 Cal.3d 727, 735, 248 Cal.Rptr. 115, 755 P.2d 299.)

Other Questions


How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
In re-examining a finding that a probation officer's social study report prejudiced a hearing, how have the courts interpreted the social studies reports? (California, United States of America)
How has the California Supreme Court interpreted statutory interpretation in the context of the California Family Law Act? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the interpretation of a federal agency's interpretation of the California Civil Code? (California, United States of America)
Does the California Supreme Court have any power or authority to interpret a section of the California Penal Code that is ambiguous and ambiguous? (California, United States of America)
How has the California Supreme Court interpreted a section of the California Guardianship Act? (California, United States of America)
How has the California Supreme Court interpreted the provisions of the California Family Law Act? (California, United States of America)
Does the California Supreme Court have authority to interpret the meaning of the California Civil Code as "plain meaning"? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the exclusionary rule adopted by the California Supreme Court in the context of Proposition 8? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the certainty requirement of section 3287 of the California Social Security Act? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.