How has the Attorney General argued that defendant forfeited a challenge to fees imposed under section 1202.4, 1465.8 and Government Code section 70373?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Davis, 262 Cal.Rptr.3d 246, 48 Cal.App.5th 543 (Cal. App. 2020):
Defendant next contends the court erred by imposing fees under sections 1202.4, 1465.8 and Government Code section 70373 without determining whether he had the ability to pay. (See generally People v. Dueas (2019) 30 Cal.App.5th 1157, 242 Cal.Rptr.3d 268 ( Dueas ).) The Attorney General argues, and we agree, that defendant forfeited this challenge by failing to object below.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does the Attorney General have any grounds to argue that a defendant has forfeited his constitutional challenge to the California Criminal Code Act? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have any authority or authority to argue that a defendant's attorney is incompetent? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have a valid case to argue that the only circumstances in aggravation listed in both the probation report and the sentencing memorandum submitted by the district attorney are the circumstances in which the sentence was imposed? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General's claim that defendant forfeited his right to challenge CALCRIM No. 330 on appeal because he did not object to it at trial? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have the authority to find that a defendant forfeited a challenge to his own educational instruction? (California, United States of America)
How have the Attorney General argued that a defendant has forfeited her constitutional right to confront under the confrontation clause? (California, United States of America)
How has the Attorney General argued that defendant has forfeited his mental disturbance and age as mitigating factors? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General's claim that defendant forfeited the issue on appeal because defendant made no effort to correct the court's misperception and press for a ruling? (California, United States of America)
When will the Attorney General say defendant forfeited the arguments against the Defendant in the Superior Court of Justice? (California, United States of America)
How has the Attorney General argued that defendant forfeited his argument by expressly concurring with the court that a lesser included offense was not required under the circumstances? (California, United States of America)
