How has section 17 of the California Code of Criminal Procedure been interpreted in the context of criminal history?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Velasquez, B264142 (Cal. App. 2016):

People v. Park illustrates this principle. There, the defendant was convicted of a felony in 2003. The trial court suspended imposition of sentence and placed him on probation. In 2006 the court reduced the conviction to a misdemeanor pursuant to section 17, subdivision (b)(3). (People v. Park, supra, 56 Cal.4th at p. 787.) When the defendant was convicted in 2007 of a new felony, the court imposed a five-year serious felony enhancement pursuant to section 667, subdivision (a), predicated on the 2003 felony conviction. (People v. Park, supra, at pp. 787-788.) Construing section 17's

Page 13

Other Questions


For the purposes of section 1202.4, subdivision (f) of the California Criminal Code, how have courts interpreted the meaning of the term "criminal conduct" in the context of a criminal conviction? (California, United States of America)
How has section 654 of the California Criminal Code been interpreted in the context of Section 654(1) of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be found to have committed a single physical act for purposes of section 654 of the California Criminal Code, Section 215 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 422 of the Criminal Code for carjacking? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for interpreting a section of California Code of Civil Procedure in the context of the California Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
For the purposes of section 1202.4, subdivision (f) of the California Criminal Code, how have courts interpreted the meaning of the term "criminal conduct" in the context of a criminal conviction? (California, United States of America)
How have sections 424, subdivision 1 and 425 of the California Criminal Code been interpreted in the context of Section 424(1) of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 654, subdivision (a) of the California Code of Criminal Procedure, section 654 of the Criminal Code, allow a defendant to be punished for more than one act? (California, United States of America)
How has section 654 of the California Criminal Code been interpreted in the context of Section 654? (California, United States of America)
How has section 654 of the California Criminal Code been interpreted in the context of assault and criminal threat charges? (California, United States of America)
How has Section 654 of the California Penal Code been interpreted and interpreted in the context of a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.