How has section 1203(e)(3) of the California Probation Guidelines been interpreted and interpreted?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Thompson, (Cal. App. 2013):

discretion." (People v. Gutierrez (2009) 174 Cal.App.4th 515, 527.) The court did not state appellant was presumptively ineligible for probation and, indeed, made no reference to section 1203(e)(3), the "unusual case[]" provision of section 1203, subdivision (e), the probation officer's conclusion on this point, or the parties' arguments regarding section 1203 at the sentencing hearing.6

Other Questions


How have the courts interpreted section 30(e) of the US Constitution on the grounds that the provisions of article 30(E) of Section 50(e of the Civil Rights Act are invalid? (California, United States of America)
Does a discretionary restitution order under section 1202.4 of the California Criminal Code apply to a grant of probation under the California Probation Act? (California, United States of America)
Is a city's interpretation of a section of the California Civil Code interpreted in the context of an administrative agency's interpretation? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of section 31103 of the California Code of Civil Procedure on the interpretation of the Section 31103 section? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
How has Section 654 of the California Penal Code been interpreted and interpreted in the context of a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
Does section 1192.7(c)(7) of the California Three Strikes Act, or does the Attorney General's interpretation of section 667.5(c))(7(b)(7)? (California, United States of America)
Is restitution a condition of probation under section 1203.1 of the California Probation Act? (California, United States of America)
Does the California Supreme Court have any power or authority to interpret a section of the California Penal Code that is ambiguous and ambiguous? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1950.5(f) of the California Statutory Guidelines for the purpose of recovering security deposits from a recalcitrant landlord? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.