How has section 1-207 of the Uniform Commercial Code changed the prevailing rule?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Connecticut Printers, Inc. v. Gus Kroesen, Inc., 134 Cal.App.3d 54, 184 Cal.Rptr. 436 (Cal. App. 1982):
Typical of the authority holding that the Uniform Commercial Code section 1-207 had changed the prevailing rule is Scholl v. Tallman (S.D.1976) 247 N.W.2d 490, 492, concluding that section 1-207:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the effect of the one third-the-midterm rule of section 1170.1, subdivision (a) under section 654 of the California Criminal Code when applying to stay a sentence under Section 654? (California, United States of America)
How have courts considered section 954 of the Criminal Code when sentencing a defendant under section 654 under Section 654? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant manipulate the rule of rule 31(d) to bypass the statutory certificate requirement under section 1237.5 of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Does the application of "ordinary rules of evidence" such as section 352 of California Evidence Code section 352 violate a defendant's constitutional rights? (California, United States of America)
Can Respondents who have not been charged with violating a section of the obscenity ordinance, such as the "obscene" section, attack the section in the disjunctive? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a section 654 section 54 ruling? (California, United States of America)
Does section 667 of the California Criminal Code prohibit the District Attorney from invoking section 654 of the Criminal Code to strike a prior conviction enhancement under Section 667? (California, United States of America)
Can a plaintiff recover damages from Respondent Respondent's failure to comply with section 27 'Change of Occupancy' section? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who has been given a life sentence for an assault with intent to murder be convicted of the crime under section 12022(a) of the Penal Code section 120 22(b) and section 5.5 of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Is section 28, subdivision (d) of the California Constitution harmonized with section I, article I, section 15 of the constitution with respect to self-incrimination? (California, United States of America)
