California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Hoffman v. Superior Ready Mix Concrete, L.P., 241 Cal.Rptr.3d 476, 30 Cal.App.5th 474 (Cal. App. 2018):
Brandt v. Superior Court (1985) 37 Cal.3d 813, 210 Cal.Rptr. 211, 693 P.2d 796.) Accordingly, apportionment was necessary because the plaintiff in Cassim could recover attorney fees for work done to obtain benefits under the insurance policy, but could not recover
[241 Cal.Rptr.3d 486]
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.