How does the US Supreme Court review challenges to the sufficiency of evidence de novo?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from United States v. Reyes, 16-0344(L), 16-739(con) (2nd Cir. 2017):
"We review challenges to the sufficiency of evidence de novo," but while "view[ing] the evidence in the light most favorable to the government, drawing all inferences in the government's favor and deferring to the jury's assessments of the witnesses' credibility." United States v. Pierce, 785 F.3d 832, 837-38 (2d Cir. 2015). "[T]he evidence must be viewed in
Page 3
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How does the US Supreme Court review challenges to the sufficiency of evidence de novo? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In reviewing verdicts for sufficiency of the evidence, what are the guidelines used by the courts in reviewing the evidence? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence in a sexual assault case, what is the test for determining if the evidence is sufficient to convict the accused? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the US Supreme Court consider whether the Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court has any authority or authority to issue an opinion in the context of judicial review? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How do we review challenges to the sufficiency of evidence de novo? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When assessing the evidence presented at trial, does a reviewing court need to conduct a thorough review of the state court record? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When reviewing a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence in a sexual assault case, what is the test for a finding that the evidence was insufficient? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a district court's decision not to admit evidence within the scope of the Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) reviewed de novo? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts treated a challenge to the sufficiency of evidence in a criminal case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a petitioner who has had a full and fair review of his Fourth Amendment claims in state court seek to have those claims reviewed by the federal appeals court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
