California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Connelly v. Bank of America Nat. Trust & Sav. Ass'n, 138 Cal.App.2d 303, 291 P.2d 501 (Cal. App. 1956):
Appellants concede that under the well established rules of appellate practice, the power of a reviewing court, where sufficiency of evidence is attacked, begins and ends with the inquiry whether there is any substantial evidence in support [138 Cal.App.2d 306] of the findings and judgment. Mead v. Smith, 106 Cal.App.2d 1, 3, 234 P.2d 705.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.