California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Tucker v. Cunningham, A143960 (Cal. App. 2015):
To satisfy the second prong of the anti-SLAPP analysis, the plaintiff " ' " ' "must demonstrate the complaint is both legally sufficient and supported by a sufficient prima facie showing of facts to sustain a favorable judgment" ' " ' " if plaintiff's evidence is credited. (Summit Bank v. Rogers (2012) 206 Cal.App.4th 669, 695.) Plaintiff need show only a "minimum level of legal sufficiency and triability." (Linder v. Thrifty Oil Co. (2000) 23 Cal.4th 429, 438, fn. 5.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.