How does assumption of risk apply in a motor vehicle accident case?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Saenz v. Whitewater Voyages, Inc., 226 Cal.App.3d 758, 276 Cal.Rptr. 672 (Cal. App. 1990):

Case law recognizes that assumption of the risk can be express or implied. Express assumption of risk is a contractual matter and comes into play where the plaintiff, in advance, expressly "agrees not to expect the [226 Cal.App.3d 763] potential defendant to act carefully...." (Coates v. Newhall Land & Farming, Inc. (1987) 191 Cal.App.3d 1, 7, 236 Cal.Rptr. 181.) In other situations a person implies consent to certain risks by voluntarily encountering a known danger.

Other Questions


Does section 3110 of the Ontario Motor Vehicle Code of Civil Procedure (Motor Vehicle Accident and Accident Benefits Act) apply to a mechanic's lien claimant? (California, United States of America)
Does the phrase "as a result of" in a motor vehicle accident apply to a section of the Motor Vehicle Accident Act? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant is liable for a motor vehicle accident under the California Vehicle Accident Act or the California Motor Vehicle Act? (California, United States of America)
Can a plaintiff bring an action under the California Motor Vehicle Accident Prevention Act for damages arising out of a motor vehicle accident? (California, United States of America)
What is the defense of accident or misfortune in a motor vehicle accident case? (California, United States of America)
In a motor vehicle accident case, in what circumstances will a jury consider whether there is an aggravating or mitigating circumstance in determining which of the two most serious penalties apply? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for applying the Witt standard in a motor vehicle accident case? (California, United States of America)
What is the relevant case law on the sufficiency of evidence in a motor vehicle accident case? (California, United States of America)
In a motor vehicle accident case, how have the courts interpreted the standard factor (a)-(b) and (b) instruction in determining the severity of the accident? (California, United States of America)
Is an employer's claim for reimbursement under section 3852 of the California Motor Vehicle Accident and Accident Compensation Act limited to recovery for damages proximately caused by the accident? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.