How does a plaintiff respond to an anti-SLAPP motion?

California, United States of America

The following excerpt is from Trufant v. City of S.F., A140278, A140352 (Cal. App. 2017):

to establish a probability of prevailing on the claim ( 425.16, subd. (b)(1)), a plaintiff responding to an anti-SLAPP motion must " 'state[] and substantiate[] a legally sufficient claim.' " [Citations.] Put another way, the plaintiff "must demonstrate that the complaint is both legally sufficient and supported by a sufficient prima facie showing of facts to sustain a favorable judgment if the evidence submitted by the plaintiff is credited." ' " (Taus v. Loftus (2007) 40 Cal.4th 683, 713-714.)

Other Questions

How have appellate courts dealt with a request for judicial notice of a motion seeking attorney fees and costs against Respondent to Respondent's request for an anti-SLAPP motion? (California, United States of America)
What is the impact of a motion to amend a motion in the Superior Court of Appeal against a motion by a defendant who alleges that the motion was improperly adjourned? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a motion to recover costs from Respondent Respondent to Respondent in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a motion to amend a motion where a plaintiff has been found to have suffered from a defect in their motion? (California, United States of America)
What is the burden of proof for a motion to dismiss a motion where the motion is to be heard at a different venue? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a court to determine whether a plaintiff has been successful on a motion of appeal against a finding that the respondent has been found to have failed to exercise his discretion in weighing the relevant factors? (California, United States of America)
When a respondent has not filed a respondents' brief in an appeal, can the court order that the respondent must file his or her own brief? (California, United States of America)
In a motion for summary adjudication on a motion to exclude evidence as to drainage, does plaintiff need to explain to the arbitrator why it was necessary to exclude the evidence? (California, United States of America)
Can a motion to strike plaintiff's "complaint" and all causes of action contained therein be considered an anti-SLAPP motion? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a court order that a motion to amend a motion brought by a plaintiff be amended? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.






Alexi purple


Company

  • About
  • Contact us
  • Press
  • Matters
  • Legal

    • Product

  • How it works
  • Pricing
  • Solo & small firms
  • Midsize firms
  • Large firms
  • In-house counsel

    • Resources

  • Resource hub
  • Sample memos
  • Blog
  • FAQ


    • © Copyright 2023 Alexi Inc. All rights reserved.