The following excerpt is from Glassman v. U.S., 892 F.2d 1045 (9th Cir. 1989):
We review de novo a district court's findings of law. United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1201 (9th Cir.) (en banc ), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824, 105 S.Ct. 101, 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984). We review a district court's findings of fact for clear error. Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 872 F.2d 1416, 1421 (9th Cir.1989). In determining the question of liability of the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act, the district court is obligated to apply the law of the state in which the accident occurred. 28 U.S.C. 1346(b). Therefore, in this case we review the district court's application of California law.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.