How can a court establish constructive possession?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Rhea, C085305 (Cal. App. 2019):
Constructive possession can be established by circumstantial evidence and reasonable inferences drawn from the defendant's conduct. (People v. Williams (1971) 5 Cal.3d 211, 215.) The inference of dominion and control is easily made when the contraband is discovered in a place over which the defendant has general dominion and
Page 7
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for establishing that language is sufficient to require the construction of a statutory definition for the purpose of establishing that a section of law does not need to include the words "constant construction" in its construction? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances would the Court have found that possession for sale and possession for possession of a firearm be a less favourable verdict than the previous verdict? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a court change the charge of simple possession of marijuana to the charged offense of possession of possession for sale? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 654 of the California Criminal Code in dealing with unlawful possession of a firearm and the concurrent possession of ammunition? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts treated a motion to suppress evidence in the case of a man accused of possession of a forklift and possession of the stolen forklift? (California, United States of America)
Whether a court's ruling is based on oral testimony or written declarations, when conflicting inferences can reasonably be drawn from the facts, can the appellate court defer to the trial court's factual determinations? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant appeal his conviction for possession of child pornography on the basis that the trial court failed to instruct the jury on the defense of transitory possession? (California, United States of America)
On a motion to be heard by the Court of Appeal at the Superior Court of California for a change of venue, does the Court have any jurisdiction or authority to hear the motion? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
