How and when can an arrestee use reasonable force to protect himself or herself?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Lopez, A151000 (Cal. App. 2018):

Here, the instructions fully advised the jury on how and when an arrestee may use reasonable force to protect himself or herself. The trial court gave CALCRIM No. 2652, which requires that the peace officer be "lawfully" performing her duty. The court then gave CALCRIM No. 2670, further describing the requirement of lawful performance by a peace officer and the right to use reasonable force to resist an officer's unlawful use of force. As noted above, CALCRIM No. 2670 advised the jury, "If a peace officer uses unreasonable or excessive force while arresting or attempting to arrest . . ., that person may lawfully use reasonable force to defend himself or herself." (Italics added.) In other words, the instruction encompassed the "defense of use of reasonable force to resist excessive force" that specifically arises in the section 69 context. (See Olguin, supra, 119 Cal.App.3d at p. 47.) " 'The right to resist excessive force used to make an arrest is an application of the law of self-defense.' " (People v. Adams (2009) 176 Cal.App.4th 946, 953; see People v. Curtis (1969) 70 Cal.2d 347, 356.)

Other Questions


Is reasonable force justified in the use of reasonable force in detaining, arresting, preventing escape and overcoming resistance? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between a reasonable and unreasonable plaintiff and a reasonable plaintiff under a "reasonable implied assumption of risk" approach? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for evidence that the appellant could reasonably reasonably reasonably expect the appellant to have knowledge of a crime? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who has been convicted under section 148(1) of the Ontario Penal Code (a)(1) for excessive force use of force against an arrestee who has not been convicted of any offences under the same section? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a reasonable probability of a more favourable result under the reasonable beyond reasonable doubt standard? (California, United States of America)
What is the proper test for determining whether there was excessive force or excessive force used by the police to force a person to submit to the use of an emetic? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of not telling the jury that a defendant must use reasonable means and reasonable force to sustain a claim of self-defense? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant can reasonably have reasonably anticipated the events leading up to the action? (California, United States of America)
Is reasonable cause reasonable cause sufficient to warrantless arrest? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for equal protection under the equal protection clause? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.