What is the test for reversing findings of fact in a motion of appeal?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from R. v. Van De Graaf, 2014 BCSC 626 (CanLII):

Findings of fact are to receive a high level of deference by appeal courts and are only reversible if it is found that the trial judge made a “palpable and overriding error”: Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33 at para. 10.

Other Questions


What is the test for an application for a stay of execution of a motion for a motion to quash a motion of appeal? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review under s. 59(1) of the Rules of Appeal Court of Appeal for a motion of appeal against the decision of a judge on a question of mixed fact and law? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the findings of the Court of Appeal in a motion seeking relief for roadside approved screening devices? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a finding that a judge must not make a finding which would directly contradict a finding previously made by another judge? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for malicious intent in the context of an appeal against the findings of a finding of malicious intent? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will a judge relitigate a finding in a motion where the original finding was invalid? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of Rule 37 of the Rules of Appeal Rule 37 on a motion of appeal? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a decision of appeal from a master be appealed from the Court of Appeal of the Master? (British Columbia, Canada)
What factors will be considered by the Court of Appeal for an appeal against the findings of fact? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can an appeal be dismissed as abandoned on the grounds that the order appealed from was interlocutory and leave to appeal had not been obtained? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.