Is there any case law or case law in which the trial judge’s decision to accept or reject the evidence?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from R. v. Parchment, 2015 BCCA 417 (CanLII):

I would not accede to this submission. It is in the trial judge’s province to determine which evidence to accept and which evidence to reject. We may not disturb his findings lightly: Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235.

Other Questions


What are the reasons of the trial judge's refusal to accept the Respondent's evidence that he requested a last chance? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there an error of law or jurisdiction in a trial judge's decision not to issue a search warrant for a fishing trawler? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Is there any case law in which a trial judge erred in directing a verdict of acquittal on the basis solely of the initial identification evidence? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Is there any evidence of judicial bias in the trial judge's reasons relied on by ING? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a trial judge's failure to give reasons sufficient to determine that the trial judge erred in appreciation of a relevant issue or application of the evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can an appellate court "reconsider" evidence presented at trial when there is a reasoned belief that the trial judge must have forgotten or misconceived the evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a judge override a trial judge's decision that a shared parenting arrangement is working well? (Alberta, Canada)
Does a trial judge have to detail every aspect of her decision if she prefers some evidence over other evidence? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the implications of the Court of Appeal's decision not to interfere with a trial judge's procedural rulings? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any basis to interfere with a trial judge's conclusion that there is no cause of action based on the rule in Rylands v Fletcher? (Ontario, Canada)