In addressing the issue of prejudice to the respondents, I am not persuaded that the grounds of appeal are strong. The core issue in the appeal is the appellants’ submission that the chambers judge erred in finding, as a fact, that the letters the respondents wrote amounted to acknowledgments of the debt. The standard of review for findings of fact is a high one; the error must be overriding and palpable: Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, 2 S.C.R. 235.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.