The trial judge also rejected the submission that because the foundations were not all immediately replaced in 1992, therefore the damage continued after that time. Although the visible deterioration may have progressed, the major defect requiring replacement of the foundations was full-blown by that time (at 153). The same argument was the subject of the decision in Home Insurance v. Landmark, 293 Cal. Rptr. 277 (Cal. App. 4 Dist, 1988) discussed below.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.