What is the test for establishing that a fence line stands a strong evidence of intent to exclude?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from McKay v. Vautour, 2019 ONSC 1312 (CanLII):

Where there is no mutual mistake as to the proper boundary line, the existence of a fence line stands a strong evidence of the intention to exclude, especially where property owners treat the fence as a boundary. See Heng v. Rodriguez, [2015] O.J. No. 1584. The Defendant’s Position

Other Questions


If a parent is intentionally undereployed, is it a bad faith or intention to evade support obligations inherent in intentional underemployment? (Ontario, Canada)
What impact would the inclusion of the evidence in the context of section 24(2) of the Charter under which the evidence is excluded? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for establishing there is no evidence to establish collusion? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for using the word "similar fact evidence" in a motion where the evidence is not the same fact evidence? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for establishing an intention to exclude a party to a property? (Ontario, Canada)
What evidence is sufficient to establish a clear breach of the Fence By-law? (Ontario, Canada)
In determining whether an employer has led sufficient evidence to give rise to a practical evidentiary burden, what is the test for this type of evidence? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there any case law that allows a plaintiff to plead both an intentional tort of negligence and an unintentional tort of intentional negligence? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for intention to exclude element in a real estate application? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the principals of the Rules of Civil Procedure apply to evidence that contradicts the evidence given by the complainants in their cross-examinations? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.