What is the test for the meaning of the phrase “whether some rationale for the offer was provided” in the context of a claim?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Paskall v. Scheithauer, 2014 BCCA 26 (CanLII):

In my view, while the discretion is very broad, it is not unfettered. It must be exercised in accordance with principle: Hartshorne v. Hartshorne, 2011 BCCA 29 at paras. 22-23. I do not consider that the phrase in Hartshorne – “whether some rationale for the offer was provided” – leads to a requirement that a party must “provide the plaintiff with evidence on which she could judge the reasonableness of the offers to settle”, as the judge suggested at para. 35.

Other Questions


Is resolution of an important part of a claim against a party in a personal injury claim against the other party to the claim substantially less impact on the balance of the claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is it necessary for a plaintiff to advance a future cost of care claim in the context of medical necessity claims? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for whether an offer was an offer that ought reasonably to have been accepted? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of using the word "defamatory meaning" in the context of a defamation claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a claim for unjust enrichment in the context of an occupation rent claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a claim in a personal injury action against a former partner is a common law claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has the court interpreted the meaning of the phrase “adequate, just and equitable” in the context of the maintenance of the spouse's children? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury claim for housekeeping services provided by a close friend, does the claim need to be reviewed carefully? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the legal test for determining whether there has been anordinate delay in determining whether a claim has been successful? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is an offer to settle providing that each party bears its own costs an offer under Rule 37A? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.