What are the factors that determine whether a plaintiff would have accepted an offer of settlement before the 2013 trial?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Chemainus Park Holdings Ltd. v. Island Timberlands GP Ltd., 2015 BCCA 325 (CanLII):

With respect to costs, he noted that the final outcome of the trial alone was not determinative; rather, the offer must be considered at the time it is made: see Hartshorne v. Hartshorne 2011 BCCA 29 at para. 27. Considering these factors, he noted that: a) the offer was made in mid-2011 well before the 2013 trial; b) the offer was one that would have resolved the need for the trial; c) the offer contained sufficient information to permit the plaintiff to understand the offer; d) the offer would have required the plaintiff to completely accept the defendant’s reasoning; e) the litigation was not protracted; and f) accepting the offer would have effectively ended the dispute between the parties. Another factor is the relationship between the terms of settlement offered in the final judgment of the court, and plainly in that regard, the defendant correctly forecast the outcome. [At paras. 40-1.] Finally, he noted that the case was a commercial one and “not one where a personal litigant would be faced with an award of costs that eviscerated an award of damages.” (Para. 43.)

Other Questions


What are the factors that determine whether a plaintiff would have accepted an offer to settle? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the reasonableness factor in determining whether a plaintiff would have accepted an offer to settle? (British Columbia, Canada)
What factors will the Court consider in deciding whether it would be unjust to find that a summary trial is appropriate to consider the issues before deciding whether to proceed with a conventional trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
What factors are considered to determine whether a plaintiff accepts an offer to settle? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the relevant factors for determining whether either of two possible jurisdictions would be suitable for the determination of issues raised by the litigation at issue? (British Columbia, Canada)
When an offer made by a defendant for pre-trial settlement is reasonably refused, is the fact that the action is ultimately dismissed in its entirety a factor in determining double costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
What factors will be considered in determining whether a plaintiff would have continued to work, or not? (British Columbia, Canada)
What factors will be considered by the courts when determining whether a plaintiff would be entitled to a general rule of common law common law costs under s. 3 of the Rules of Civil Procedure? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the factors that determine whether an offer to settle was open for acceptance? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the factors used to determine whether an offer to settle was open for acceptance? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.