What are the reasons of the trial judge in an action brought by the remaining defendants?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Clifford Associates Consulting Ltd. v. Clifford, 1996 CanLII 3218 (BC CA):
This action came to trial against the remaining defendants, who are the present appellants. The reasons of the trial judge are reported under the name Hanson v. Clifford at (1994), 21 B.L.R. (2d) 108; 59 C.P.R. (3d) 465.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is a trial judge's failure to give reasons sufficient to determine that the trial judge erred in appreciation of a relevant issue or application of the evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are sufficient reasons are required for a trial judge to leave a defendant with no reasonable doubt? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a plaintiff in a personal injury action commence an action against a defendant in the same action against the same defendant? (British Columbia, Canada)
When an offer is made by a defendant for a pre-trial settlement is reasonably refused, is the fact that the entire action is ultimately dismissed in its entirety a factor in determining double costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a learned trial judge's reasoning apply when the action of the landlord in terminating the lease was lawful? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will a judge award damages of more than £200,000 to a plaintiff in a defamation action brought by a defendant who used justification and qualified privilege? (British Columbia, Canada)
In an appeal from an acquittal, can the reasonableness of the trial judge’s reasons be considered to be inadequate? (British Columbia, Canada)
When an offer made by a defendant for the purpose of achieving a pre-trial settlement is reasonably refused, is the fact that the action is ultimately dismissed in its entirety a consideration for double costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
When an offer made by a defendant for pre-trial settlement is reasonably refused, is the fact that the action is ultimately dismissed in its entirety a factor in determining double costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a summary trial judge make a finding that a matter is not suitable for disposition by way of summary trial during the hearing of the summary trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
