What is the burden of identifying a presumptive connecting factor and of showing its applicability to a dispute?
Alberta, Canada
The following excerpt is from Nohnychuk v Patrick, 2017 ABPC 226 (CanLII):
The party arguing that the court should assume jurisdiction bears the burden of identifying a presumptive connecting factor and of showing its applicability to the dispute. Gulevich v. Miller, 2015 ABCA 411, at para. 18 Van Breda at para. 100
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the difference between psychological factors and physical factors in the diagnosis of chronic pain syndrome? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the applicable law for a Summary Dismissal Application? (Alberta, Canada)
In an application for a writ of habeas corpus, is the court bound by virtue of the fact that the court has granted custody of a child in a custody dispute? (Alberta, Canada)
In a non-parental application for access to a child, does the court need to be careful not to allow the argument of conflict or potential conflict to defeat the application? (Alberta, Canada)
What are the rules applicable to an application for leave to take the next step? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the "pragmatic and functional approach" used to determine the deference applicable to an administrative tribunal on an application for judicial review? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for an application to appeal against a finding that an application is frivolous? (Alberta, Canada)
What factors must be considered in a variation application under the Divorce Act? (Alberta, Canada)
What are the legal principles applicable to this action? (Alberta, Canada)
In a wrongful dismissal action, is income tax calculated as a factor in determining damages? (Alberta, Canada)
