Does a plaintiff have to apply for declaratory judgment in the Superior Court of Justice Scarth’s order that struck down the infringing legislation on January 11, 2000?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Shaw v. Reinhart et al, 2004 BCSC 588 (CanLII):

Even if the defendants are correct in asserting that Mr. Justice Scarth’s order did not strike down the infringing legislation on January 11, 2000, but did so one month later, the best arguable position on the part of the defendants is that the plaintiff must apply for the same declaratory judgment as had the plaintiff in Grigg v. Berg. In my opinion, it would be manifestly unjust for the plaintiff’s claim to be summarily dismissed on the basis that her rights should be other than those of the plaintiff in Grigg v. Berg, and different than others in her position following Mr. Justice Scarth’s order and following a subsequent change in legislation.

Other Questions


What are the principles used by the Court of Appeal in making an order to refer the issue to the Superior Court of Justice? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the BC Supreme Court of Justice order a further review order to order that an expert in economic forecasting of the economic circumstances of a separated spouse be reviewed? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a declaratory order be made against a party to a motion of no confidence in the Superior Court of Justice? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the consent order of 1981 consent order on spousal support issue order apply to a nominal support order? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the Supreme Court in BCSC 871 interpret the principles of the Court of Appeal in the context of the Canadian Court of Justice's decision on the doctrine of common law? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the Superior Court of Justice have concurrent jurisdiction with the Federal Court to hear a habeas corpus application? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the Supreme Court order that an order be made by the Court of Appeal be made in special circumstances? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is the Chief Justice of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of B.C holding that the Court has jurisdiction to determine whether a person who is not a party to a particular type of tortfeasor has a valid claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review applied by the Court of Appeal in determining the apportionment of fault between a plaintiff and plaintiff? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a finding of contempt based on a failure to obey a court order result in the application being subsumed into the contempt order? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.