In Nayar v. Doe, 2008 BCSC 1320, the plaintiff, who was the franchisee of a gas station was working when someone attempted to gas-and-dash, that is, to fill up the tank and leave without paying. The franchise policy under which the gas station operated was clear: there was to be no pursuit. The plaintiff assumed that the defendant, a nicely-dressed female had simply failed to pay for gas by mistake and had no intention to commit a theft. Accordingly, he approached her to remind her to pay.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.