How to apply Lord Denning's approach in a motor vehicle accident case?

Saskatchewan, Canada


The following excerpt is from Vigoren v. Nystuen, 2006 SKCA 47 (CanLII):

The Froom v. Butcher approach also recommends itself because of its practical workability. Its application may require a judge or jury to sort through complex evidence concerning the extent to which injury might have been prevented by seat belt use. Nonetheless, the fundamental concepts involved in Lord Denning's approach are straightforward and easily understood.

Other Questions


How have courts dealt with a claim for damages arising out of a motor vehicle accident under the Motor Vehicle Accident Prevention Act? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can a defendant be found not to be negligent in a motor vehicle accident where the vehicle is locked in a fenced-off secure area and the keys to the vehicle are locked? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the case law on voluntary testimony in a motor vehicle accident case? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the effect of a jury’s decision in a motor vehicle accident case when they are asked to award a jury a verdict of 2,000 for loss of a leg? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for charging the jury in a motor vehicle accident case? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for personal injury claims in a motor vehicle accident case? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How has the date of judgment been calculated in a motor vehicle accident case? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In a motor vehicle accident case, how have the tax implications of an award been considered? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for a plaintiff to prove reasonable excuse in a motor vehicle accident case? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the burden of proving negligence against a defendant in a motor vehicle accident case? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.