In what circumstances have the Rules of Civil Procedure been interpreted correctly?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Yan et al v Nabhani, 2016 CanLII 27027 (ON SC):
In my opinion, Justice Perell in Fromm v. Rajani et al [2009] O.J. No. 3671 (S.C.J.), correctly analyzed and interpreted the rules relative to the steps required to move an action to trial, in particular, rules 48.02, 48.04, 48.06 and 48.07.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In what circumstances will an arbitrator be bound to follow the interpretation of Arbitrator Starkman’s interpretation of the Interpretation of the Arbitrator's Interpretation in a dispute? (Ontario, Canada)
What steps have been taken in a civil action under Rule 1(8) of the Rules of Civil Procedure? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances has the Court considered an offer to settle a claim for damages under Rule 49 of the Rules of Civil Procedure? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances will rule 49 of the Rules of Civil Procedure be engaged? (Ontario, Canada)
How has Rule 25.11 of the Rules of Civil Procedure been interpreted? (Ontario, Canada)
How has Rule 6 of the Rules of Civil Procedure been interpreted? (Ontario, Canada)
Can the court use the application procedure under rule 14.05(h) of the Rules of Civil Procedure to determine whether there will be any material facts in dispute? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances will the court award costs under Rule 24(1) of the Rules of Civil Procedure in a family law case? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for making an Order under Rule 33 of the Rules of Civil Procedure? (Ontario, Canada)
How does rule 16 of the Rules of Civil Procedure apply to summary judgment? (Ontario, Canada)
