Does a lawyer who holds corporate records constitute a lawyer for the corporation?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from Amack v. AW Holdings Corp., 2010 ABQB 759 (CanLII):

In Friesen v. Gimli & District Metis Assn. Inc. [1997] M.J. No. 396, at paragraph 16 it was held that the fact that a lawyer held corporate records and was the registered office for the company, did not in itself constitute the firm as counsel for the corporation.

Other Questions


Where someone who is not the client gives information to a lawyer, and expects the lawyer to hold it in confidence, what analysis is needed to reach the conclusion? (Alberta, Canada)
What constitutes the practice of law in the context of a non-lawyer holding himself out to be an agent? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a third party holding the record be compelled to produce the record directly or directly? (Alberta, Canada)
Does a refusal by the judge to appoint a lawyer for the accused constitute sufficient to warrant a new trial? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a lawyer who acts as an acting qua lawyer for a plaintiff in a personal injury action be held liable for improper conduct? (Alberta, Canada)
Does the holding of a public inquiry into historical abuse constitute a consideration that falls within the power to stay a subsequent prosecution? (Alberta, Canada)
Is there any common law common law concept or common law relation to corporate shields or corporate vale? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a lawyer who is not a lawyer able to function in a non-legal capacity to provide solicitor-client advice? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a shareholder of a corporation who is not a majority shareholder of the corporation obtain relief under the oppression provisions? (Alberta, Canada)
Would the admission of the balloons in evidence constitute judicial condonation of unacceptable conduct by the investigatory or prosecutorial agencies? (Alberta, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.