Courts generally decline to decide cases which raise merely hypothetical questions. Occasionally, however, a court may exercise its discretion to address an issue that is moot. For example, if an important question arises recurrently, but only briefly, the court may decide to answer it even though there is no longer a live controversy in the case: Borowski v. Canada (Attorney General), 1989 CanLII 123 (SCC), [1989] 1 S.C.R. 342 at 358-363.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.