What is the reason why a court dismissed an application to strike from a mortgage investment corporation?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from EY Holdings Ltd. v. Great Pacific Mortgage & Investments Ltd., 2017 BCCA 405 (CanLII):

Reasons for Judgment were released on January 27, 2017. The chambers judge dismissed the application to strike on the basis that he was not satisfied that it was plain and obvious that the rule in Foss v. Harbottle applied to a mortgage investment corporation.

Other Questions


Can an application to dismiss on an interlocutory application be dismissed? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the reasons for dismissing an application to dismiss an action for want of prosecution? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can the court use its power to control the abuse of the court’s process by litigants pursuing vexatious applications? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can an application to strike be struck as disclosing no reasonable cause of action? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the Director of Directors of a Corporation be able to claim that a claim against the Corporation is based on an allegation that the Corporation has not paid the Director a fair share of the proceeds of litigation? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a stay application to stay an application at the Court of Appeal? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for dismissing an application to dismiss a claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a party be awarded special costs of an application to strike an action as an abuse of court process? (British Columbia, Canada)
On an interim support application, can the court get bogged down with the merits of the application? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can an application be brought to dismiss an application under s. 27(1)(c) of the Rules of Civil Procedure Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.