With respect to counsel’s argument regarding the fiduciary obligations of the AMS towards its members, counsel submits that a fiduciary duty is a duty of the utmost good faith, requiring the party with the fiduciary duty to place the interests of the fiduciary above its own: see Frame v. Smith, 1987 CanLII 74 (SCC), [1987] 2 S.C.R. 99. In that decision, at para. 60, Wilson J. summarized the jurisprudence in principle with respect to fiduciary relationships, and she described three general characteristics of relationships in which a fiduciary obligation had been imposed: (1) the fiduciary has scope for the exercise of some discretion or power; (2) the fiduciary can unilaterally exercise that power or discretion so as to affect the beneficiary’s legal or practical interest; and (3) the beneficiary is particularly vulnerable to or at the mercy of the fiduciary holding the discretion or power.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.