The court in Ferguson v. Charlton, a three-step process for assessing non-compliance in the context of Rules 1(8): 1. Has there been a triggering event (i.e., non-compliance with a court order)? 2. If a there has been a triggering event, is it appropriate to exercise the court’s discretion to not sanction the party’s non-compliance? This discretion will be exercised in “exceptional circumstances”, and ought to take into account the history of the litigation and the conduct of the non-complying party. 3. If the court determines that it should not exercise its discretion in favour of the non-complying party, what is the appropriate remedy to impose?[17]
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.