How have courts interpreted the principle of "temporary" employment in the context of federal employment law?
Canada (Federal), Canada
The following excerpt is from Robert v. Deputy Minister of Citizenship and Immigration Canada et al., 2008 PSST 20 (CanLII):
As explained in Wylie, at paragraph 21: The courts have recognized the need for flexibility to assign federal public service employees to functions on a temporary basis without this giving rise to the application of merit and the right of recourse. The case of Doré v. Canada, 1987 CanLII 37 (SCC), [1987] 2 S.C.R. 503, is illustrative of both this principle and its limitations.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does a state court have the authority to interpret the findings of a federal court when determining whether a federal judge has found that a state judge has jurisdiction to interpret a federal finding? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a federal district court's interpretation of a federal statute a de novo review of the interpretation of the federal statute? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How has the Court interpreted the doctrine of federal jurisdiction in the context of the federal courts? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a federal district court's interpretation of a federal statute a de novo review of the interpretation of the federal statute? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for a federal district court to determine whether a state court or federal court has jurisdiction to rule on a federal Railroad Commission case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have federal appeals courts reviewed state court rulings in the context of federal habeas proceedings? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does Section 5G1.3 of the Federal Guidelines for Federal Sentences apply to a defendant who is convicted of a federal charge of possession of a firearm by a federal court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted federal legislation in the context of constitutional interpretation? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a federal judge required to interpret a state statute before the federal courts interpret it first? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a state court rejects some claims but does not expressly address a federal claim, can the federal court presume that the federal claim was adjudicated on the merits? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
