A court could also entertain a motion for dismissal for delay in a family law matter as part of r. 2(3), which requires the court to deal with cases justly and consistently, with the court’s duty in r. 2(4) to promote that primary objective. See: Furtney Estate v. Furtney, 2013 ONSC 6687, 235 A.C.W.S. (3d) 667, at para. 80
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.