It is not for the extradition judge to choose from competing inferences. The fact that the evidence could also support an inference consistent with innocence is insufficient to fail to commit. The test is whether a jury could convict on the evidence, not whether it would convict. The choice between competing inferences is a decision for the finder of fact at trial: United States of America v. Hislop, 2009 BCCA 94 at para. 31.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.