Is expert evidence a necessity in assisting the trier of fact?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Stetson Oil & Gas Ltd. v. Stifel Nicolaus Canada Inc., 2013 ONSC 1300 (CanLII):

In determining whether expert evidence is a necessity in assisting the trier of fact, what is required is that the opinion be necessary in the sense that it provides information which is likely to be outside the experience and knowledge of a judge or jury. See R v. Mohan at para. 26.

Other Questions


What is the test for using the word "similar fact evidence" in a motion where the evidence is not the same fact evidence? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a non-expert expert give evidence in a motor vehicle accident case that does not contradict the findings of an expert? (Ontario, Canada)
In determining that the contents of the cigarette package was tobacco processed in the form of cigarettes, and in the absence of any evidence supporting that tobacco products contained in the cigarette box contained tobacco, does the prosecution need to call expert scientific evidence? (Ontario, Canada)
If a defence expert has been videotaped at trial, is the defence expert required to be reviewed by the other defence expert? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the trier of fact on circumstantial evidence? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for finding a solicitor negligent in the absence of expert evidence? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the role of a judge as a gatekeeper for expert evidence at trial? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a conclusion or opinion from a witness be admitted as non-expert opinion evidence? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the principals of the Rules of Civil Procedure apply to evidence that contradicts the evidence given by the complainants in their cross-examinations? (Ontario, Canada)
When is a statement in hearsay considered by the trier of fact? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.