Is fact evidence relevant in determining whether a party has been negligent in a prior negligence claim?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Woods et al v. Jackiewicz et al, 2013 ONSC 519 (CanLII):

In Wilson v. Lind, [1985] O.J. No. 535, Justice O’Brien held: “our courts have held for a long time, and for good reason, that prior negligence of a party is generally irrelevant to proof of subsequent negligence.” Similar fact evidence is an exception to this general statement.

Other Questions


What factors are considered to be determinative in determining whether a person will be successful in their claim to be a property owner? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard for determining whether a party has breached a duty of care and is negligent? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a party has sufficient income to support its claim? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the relevant factors for determining whether a party can obtain a conditional discharge? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a claim can be made against a third party? (Ontario, Canada)
When determining whether a party has been successful in obtaining a final order in a personal injury action, does the court have to consider any other settlement offer made by the parties? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for a court to determine whether a party to a claim against a property is entitled to sue the property owner? (Ontario, Canada)
In determining whether an employer has led sufficient evidence to give rise to a practical evidentiary burden, what is the test for this type of evidence? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a motion for a stay of execution pending a counter-claim, cross-claim and third party claim valid? (Ontario, Canada)
Is Rule 24(1) of the Rules of Civil Procedure applicable in determining costs of a claim against a party who is successful in a claim? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.